On September 3, 2014, the General Office of the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television issued and distributed Xinguang Dianfa Document No. 204 [2014], which will restrict and comprehensively govern the introduction of overseas video and television dramas by video sites. It is understood that this document has been issued to various network audiovisual institutions. According to the requirements and deployment of documents, related work is steadily underway.
The contents of the document are as follows
The No. 204 document is based on the "Regulations for the Administration of Broadcasting and Television" (State Council Decree No. 228), "Regulations on the Administration of Internet Audio-visual Program Services" (Regulation of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, No. 56 of the Ministry of Information Industry), and the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, on strengthening the transmission of film and television on the Internet. The relevant laws and regulations, such as the "Notice of Drama Management" (Guangfa [2007] No. 122), etc., and the overseas film and television dramas used in the Internet and other information networks, shall obtain the "License for Film Releases" and the "Permit for the Distribution of TV Dramas" according to law.
This is another document that the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China has imposed on the regulation of Internet companies following the No. 181 document issued in 2011. The only difference is that the previous 181 documents were mainly directed to Internet terminals and managed the Internet's pipeline. The 204 document is mainly for Internet video content.
In the past, SARFT had severely rectified Internet companies. First, it issued a document requesting the rectification of Internet TV licenses and several BesTVs, closing all types of video app and video aggregation software and Internet browser software in all Internet TV terminal products. The download channel then asks “Cable TV Networks to vigorously carry out TVOS 1.0 scale application trialsâ€. It also requires that cable network companies not install other operating systems other than TVOS; then it requires that all Internet TV boxes must stop providing TV programs. And look back at the function; followed by a "box the most stringent order" issued: not only requires the introduction of foreign film and television drama, micro film must be off the line within a week, but also said that unapproved end products are not allowed to market; Even naming criticism of CNTV's (China Network TV)'s weak TV reforms in the future, pointed out that the cooperation of the millet, music as the set-top box UI (user interface) violations; finally requires the video site to drop the TV side APP, otherwise it will cancel the Internet Audiovisual license and stop the server.
Faced with the SARFT's control of the box, it was analyzed that only the radio and television operators actively promoted the OTT industry chain to have profitable hopes. Now telecom operators such as China Telecom and China Unicom welcome OTT and IPTV, because they can promote broadband and share content sales. However, radio and television operators around the country, such as Southern Media, Hunan Radio and TV, Jiangsu Cable, etc., users seeing OTT, will remove the radio and television. Therefore, only the supervision and content of the radio and television system will ultimately be separated.
Now SARFT has again driven the knife to the neck of the video content. The OTT pipeline of the next video site has no pipeline, the entrance does not have entrance, the content has no content, and one cannot help but someone has to ask the Internet video website what else can be done. Where will the OTT exit be?
According to industry analysts, if the No. 181 document issued in 2011 is a management terminal, Document No. 204 is the content. This may end the long-term management of the dual-track system of the Internet and the cable network by the General Administration of Administration, so that everyone will return to the same starting line.
If you don’t get on TV, then you’ll continue to play with mobile devices. Cable TV cannot be seen or cannot be seen. It can be viewed on video websites and viewed on mobile phone PAD. However, No. 204 has been published... Those that allow users to chase after Content, the things that make the Internet proud, are now restricted.
In fact, from the point of view of the document, the General Administration of the People’s Republic of China’s move is to encourage the introduction of broadcasted, healthy, well-produced, and overseas TV dramas that meet the requirements of a variety of eligible Internet audio-visual program service websites. Only this kind of broadcast adds some strict restrictions and audits. It requires that overseas films and television dramas broadcasted on the Internet should be legally granted the “Permit for the Public Release of Films†and the “Distribution License for TV Dramas†issued by the Department of Press, Publication, Radio, TV, etc. Approved the document and obtained the right of dissemination of information network granted by the copyright owner. The video website has only obtained the "Information Network Communication Audiovisual Program Permit" issued by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, and the licensing program contains the "Fifth Category II Internet Audiovisual Program Services": the collection of movies, television shows and cartoon-like audiovisual programs. "On airing business" can only introduce overseas film and television dramas specifically designed for information network dissemination.
“There are laws that can be followed, laws must be followed, laws must be enforced strictly, and violations must be investigated.†The law is there, but is it to live? How to deal with SARFT's documents for those restricted video websites? Many people still choose to complain, accept the reality, re-search for a new position, revisit the No. 204 document, and allow themselves to adapt to this period of change.
Scholars from the School of Television and Journalism at the Communication University of China have stated that at this stage, China's OTT TV service providers should continue to standardize the operating model and self-discipline mechanism within the framework of the policy, focusing on user needs, integrating high-quality content resources and massive application services, and innovating profitability. Modes and marketing methods, multi-party cooperation, to create a healthy and healthy development of the OTT TV industry chain.
This is another document that the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China has imposed on the regulation of Internet companies following the No. 181 document issued in 2011. The only difference is that the previous 181 documents were mainly directed to Internet terminals and managed the Internet's pipeline. The 204 document is mainly for Internet video content.
In the past, SARFT had severely rectified Internet companies. First, it issued a document requesting the rectification of Internet TV licenses and several BesTVs, closing all types of video app and video aggregation software and Internet browser software in all Internet TV terminal products. The download channel then asks “Cable TV Networks to vigorously carry out TVOS 1.0 scale application trialsâ€. It also requires that cable network companies not install other operating systems other than TVOS; then it requires that all Internet TV boxes must stop providing TV programs. And look back at the function; followed by a "box the most stringent order" issued: not only requires the introduction of foreign film and television drama, micro film must be off the line within a week, but also said that unapproved end products are not allowed to market; Even naming criticism of CNTV's (China Network TV)'s weak TV reforms in the future, pointed out that the cooperation of the millet, music as the set-top box UI (user interface) violations; finally requires the video site to drop the TV side APP, otherwise it will cancel the Internet Audiovisual license and stop the server.
Faced with the SARFT's control of the box, it was analyzed that only the radio and television operators actively promoted the OTT industry chain to have profitable hopes. Now telecom operators such as China Telecom and China Unicom welcome OTT and IPTV, because they can promote broadband and share content sales. However, radio and television operators around the country, such as Southern Media, Hunan Radio and TV, Jiangsu Cable, etc., users seeing OTT, will remove the radio and television. Therefore, only the supervision and content of the radio and television system will ultimately be separated.
Now SARFT has again driven the knife to the neck of the video content. The OTT pipeline of the next video site has no pipeline, the entrance does not have entrance, the content has no content, and one cannot help but someone has to ask the Internet video website what else can be done. Where will the OTT exit be?
According to industry analysts, if the No. 181 document issued in 2011 is a management terminal, Document No. 204 is the content. This may end the long-term management of the dual-track system of the Internet and the cable network by the General Administration of Administration, so that everyone will return to the same starting line.
If you don’t get on TV, then you’ll continue to play with mobile devices. Cable TV cannot be seen or cannot be seen. It can be viewed on video websites and viewed on mobile phone PAD. However, No. 204 has been published... Those that allow users to chase after Content, the things that make the Internet proud, are now restricted.
In fact, from the point of view of the document, the General Administration of the People’s Republic of China’s move is to encourage the introduction of broadcasted, healthy, well-produced, and overseas TV dramas that meet the requirements of a variety of eligible Internet audio-visual program service websites. Only this kind of broadcast adds some strict restrictions and audits. It requires that overseas films and television dramas broadcasted on the Internet should be legally granted the “Permit for the Public Release of Films†and the “Distribution License for TV Dramas†issued by the Department of Press, Publication, Radio, TV, etc. Approved the document and obtained the right of dissemination of information network granted by the copyright owner. The video website has only obtained the "Information Network Communication Audiovisual Program Permit" issued by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, and the licensing program contains the "Fifth Category II Internet Audiovisual Program Services": the collection of movies, television shows and cartoon-like audiovisual programs. "On airing business" can only introduce overseas film and television dramas specifically designed for information network dissemination.
“There are laws that can be followed, laws must be followed, laws must be enforced strictly, and violations must be investigated.†The law is there, but is it to live? How to deal with SARFT's documents for those restricted video websites? Many people still choose to complain, accept the reality, re-search for a new position, revisit the No. 204 document, and allow themselves to adapt to this period of change.
Scholars from the School of Television and Journalism at the Communication University of China have stated that at this stage, China's OTT TV service providers should continue to standardize the operating model and self-discipline mechanism within the framework of the policy, focusing on user needs, integrating high-quality content resources and massive application services, and innovating profitability. Modes and marketing methods, multi-party cooperation, to create a healthy and healthy development of the OTT TV industry chain.
Recommended installation sofa butler Download: http://app.shafa.com/
Bath Mat,Shower Mat,Bathroom Mats,Bath Rugs
Cixi Mingsheng Rubber & Plastic Co.,Ltd. , https://www.cixidoormats.com